Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogFischman & Schanzenbach on Judicial Discretion & Federal Sentencing
By Lawrence Solum
-
This paper examines the role judicial discretion plays in enhancing or mitigating racial disparity in federal sentencing. The United States Sentencing Guidelines created a detailed framework for criminal sentencing, motivated in part by a desire to reduce unwarranted racial disparities. Although the Guidelines substantially constrain sentencing discretion, a judge may depart from the Guidelines if the judge determines that the case is sufficiently unique. Over the Guidelines? history, the Supreme Court and Congress have changed appellate review standards for these sentencing departures, alternating between a strict de novo standard and a more deferential ?abuse of discretion? standard. If judicial adherence to the Guidelines reduces racial disparities, then racial disparities should be lower under a de novo review standard. On the other hand, judicial discretion may permit judges to mitigate structural biases created by the Guidelines or the biases of other actors, such as prosecutors, in which case disparities could be larger under a de novo standard. We find that a deferential standard of review reduces racial disparities in the relative departure rate and at times reduces racial disparities in prison sentences. In other words, when review is strict (de novo), judges adhere more to the Guidelines but racial disparities increase. We present some very preliminary evidence that the recent Supreme Court decisions making the Guidelines merely ?advisory? have increased racial disparities. We cautiously conclude that the disparity-minimizing sentencing regime is one of deferential review under mandatory Guidelines.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on July 12, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
Arrow Trucking Hit with Federal Lawsuit by Employees
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
Parents Bring Federal Lawsuit After Tainted Baby Formula Injures Newborn
Parents Bring Federal Lawsuit After Tainted Baby Formula Injures Newborn
Federal Government
alleging discrimination against black farmers
Federal National Mortgage Association
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

"Do Standards of Review Matter The Case of Federal Criminal Sentencing"
New piece on federal prosecutorial discretion
Judicial Sentencing After the Booker/Fanfan Decision
"Into the Twilight Zone: Informing Judicial Discretion in Federal Sentencing"
A must-read on the politics of sentencing on a big election day









