ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Legal Theory Blog

Fischman & Schanzenbach on Judicial Discretion & Federal Sentencing

By Lawrence Solum

ADVERTISEMENTS
Joshua B. Fischman and Max M. Schanzenbach (University of Virginia School of Law and Northwestern University - School of Law) have posted Racial Disparities, Judicial Discretion, and the United States Sentencing Guidelines on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
    This paper examines the role judicial discretion plays in enhancing or mitigating racial disparity in federal sentencing. The United States Sentencing Guidelines created a detailed framework for criminal sentencing, motivated in part by a desire to reduce unwarranted racial disparities. Although the Guidelines substantially constrain sentencing discretion, a judge may depart from the Guidelines if the judge determines that the case is sufficiently unique. Over the Guidelines? history, the Supreme Court and Congress have changed appellate review standards for these sentencing departures, alternating between a strict de novo standard and a more deferential ?abuse of discretion? standard. If judicial adherence to the Guidelines reduces racial disparities, then racial disparities should be lower under a de novo review standard. On the other hand, judicial discretion may permit judges to mitigate structural biases created by the Guidelines or the biases of other actors, such as prosecutors, in which case disparities could be larger under a de novo standard. We find that a deferential standard of review reduces racial disparities in the relative departure rate and at times reduces racial disparities in prison sentences. In other words, when review is strict (de novo), judges adhere more to the Guidelines but racial disparities increase. We present some very preliminary evidence that the recent Supreme Court decisions making the Guidelines merely ?advisory? have increased racial disparities. We cautiously conclude that the disparity-minimizing sentencing regime is one of deferential review under mandatory Guidelines.

Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on July 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)