Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogThomas on the Seventh Amendment & Damage Remedies Administered by Non-Article III Courts
By Lawrence Solum
-
The Supreme Court has interpreted many parts of the Constitution to limit the power of Congress including, for example, Articles I, II and III and the First Amendment. This Symposium Article argues that another part of the Constitution, the Seventh Amendment, has not been viewed similarly by the Court, and that this view is incorrect. The Article first assumes that the Court has properly adopted the English common law in 1791 as the law governing the Seventh Amendment. Using this law, in decisions on whether a jury trial right exists for a cause of action created by Congress, the Court has analyzed both whether the cause of action is sufficiently analogous to an English common law cause of action and whether the relief sought is of the type decided by juries in English common law courts. This two-prong examination has occurred despite the fact that whether a jury heard a claim in England in 1791 was based, with very few exceptions, only on the second prong - the relief sought, with damages being heard by juries. Also, the Court has been deferential to Congressional decisions to place certain damages decisions in non-Article III forums, without a jury trial right, including in administrative agencies and bankruptcy courts. This Article argues that, at least in part because of this deferential way in which the Court has viewed Congress, the Seventh Amendment civil jury trial right has been improperly curtailed. The inquiry as to whether a jury trial right exists under the Seventh Amendment should be based only on the relief sought and a jury trial right exists for Congressionally-created causes of action with damages remedies, including ones that Congress has relegated to administrative agencies and bankruptcy courts.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on July 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Bextra Product Recall
Find a Bextra Lawyer
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Ortho Evra Patch Risk
Ortho Evra Side Effects
Have you or a loved one suffered from Ortho Evra side effects?
Ortho Evra Side Effects
Zicam Cold Remedies
FDA Advises "Don't Use"
Toy Recall
RC2 Corporation agrees to $30 million Thomas and Friends lead paint contamination class action settlement.
Hotel Food Poisoning
Thomson Holiday and JMC-Thomas Cook awards British travelers a £2.5 million personal injury settlement.
Denture Cream
Linked to Nerve Damage
Paxil
Found to Damage Sperm and Inhibit Fertility
Vytorin
alleged risk of heart attack and liver damage.

Attorney Sanctions In Seventh Circuit Compared
When a party asserts the Fifth Amendment in a divorce proceeding
Seventh Circuit resists extending Second Amendment to the states
Second Amendment Not Applicable to States, Seventh Circuit Rules
Fourth Amendment cases, citation, and links added
Two Federal Courts Undercut the First Amendment









