Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> JURIST - Hotline
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: JURIST - HotlineAfter decision, Congress must enact narrower statute banning crush films
By Andrew Wood
ADVERTISEMENTS
Jeffrey S. Kerr [General Counsel and Vice President of Corporate Affairs, The PETA Foundation]: "Crush fetish videos, which this law was enacted in 1999 to prohibit, are made for a niche market of individuals who derive sexual satisfaction from watching animals being tortured and slowly killed. The intent of the Founding Fathers in drafting the Bill of Rights was to reduce the likelihood of oppression, and the First Amendment was meant to protect the exchange of ideas and open discourse. It is not in the spirit of the Constitution to allow or encourage gratuitous depictions of torture for sexual gratification or profit, which is why, in 1982, the US SupremeFull post as published by JURIST - Hotline on April 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Best Law Movies
Greatest Legal Movies selected by ABA Journal
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Supreme Court to Rule on Free Speech Claim Over Animal Cruelty Films
Does Congress Have the Authority to Enact a Health Insurance Mandate Using its Power to Tax
Supreme Court Strikes Down Statute At Issue in "Crush Video" Case
Supreme Court strikes down animal cruelty video ban









