ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectHolder v. Humanitarian Law Project
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
SCOTUSblog analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08?1498 (U.S. June 21, 2010): "For the first time in nearly nine years of what the government has called a 'war on terrorism,' the Supreme Court on Monday ruled decisively in the government?s favor ? but still stopped short of providing an unqualified victory. The Court ruled, by a 6-3 vote, that it does not violate the Constitution for the government to block speech and other forms of advocacy supporting a foreign organization that has been officially labeled as terrorist, even if the aim is to support such a group's peaceful or humanitarian actions.'" | See full post for more information.Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Times Profiles Fertig, of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Next major First Amendment test
Oral Argument in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Podcasts: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Opinion Analysis: Material Support Statute Upheld







