ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

Editorial: Electing PA Judges is ?Dubious Big Business?

By Peter Hardin

ADVERTISEMENTS

A powerful legislator is bottling up a bill to let Pennsylvania voters weigh adopting merit selection for appellate judges, under circumstances that a leading state newspaper has condemned.

A Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial sharply criticizes State Rep. Thomas R. Caltagirone, a Democrat and House Judiciary Committee chairman, for saying he has no plans to move legislation that would let voters choose to scrap contested elections for appellate judges.

Not only does the editorial question the quality of some judges who take the bench through elections, but it also labels the elections a “dubious big business:”

“Everybody knows that in this state political hacks and others who have nothing to recommend them but a familiar name can easily become judges in the lottery of a judicial election.

“People also know that electing judges has become dubious big business — last year $4.7 million was spent on the state Supreme Court race and now Sen. Jane Orie, the sister of the successful candidate, Joan Orie Melvin, stands accused of politicking on state time. If merit selection had been in place, neither the cost nor the controversy would have occurred.”

Moreover, voters would not be cut out of the process if Pennsylvania adopted a merit selection plan that uses a screening panel to recommend judicial candidates to the governor, the editorial says. Citizens would belong to the 14-member panel. Once a judge has taken the bench, voters would decide in up-or-down “retention” elections whether to keep the judge there.

The editorial concludes with a double-barreled blast at Caltagirone and Democratic House leaders who allow him his way:

“The status quo exercises its powers to turn back another threat to the status quo — and the public be damned.”

To learn more about the debate in Pennsylvania over merit selection, check out Gavel Grab, and to read about merit selection, visit Justice at Stake’s issues page on the topic.

Full post as published by The Gavel on June 17, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0118 secs (new cache)