Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Open Congress
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Politics
: Open CongressIs Lincoln Quietly Gutting Her Derivatives Plan?
By Sunlight Foundation & Participatory Politics Foundation
Yesterday, Sen. Blanche Lincoln [D, AR] issued a “term sheet” that her spokesperson said sought to clarify the intent of her proposal, Sec. 716, to ban derivatives desks at bank-holding companies from accessing federal subsidies via the Fed discount window and FDIC insurance. Most discussion of the term sheet was focused on the two-year phase-in proposal and a somewhat ambiguous study that would be required, but looking it over myself, I think it may be more of a gutting than a clarification.
Since I’m on a bus and typing in my seat is pretty uncomfortable, I’m going to be lazy here and quote from an email I wrote last night to a group of friends and bloggers who are working to digest these developments:
I don’t understand how this new compromise can be considered the same provision if it is going to allow Fed Act Section 13(3) actions for swap entities. Sec. 716 as it exists right now is called “the prohibition against federal government bailouts of swap entities.” Section 13(3) of the Fed Act says that the Fed can give discount money and loans to anyone they want when they deem it is an “exigent and unusual circumstance.” Sounds like a bailout to me, and, in fact, it was used repeatedly in 2008-2009 to authorize all kinds of Fed bailout actions.
The text of Lincoln’s “term sheet” is: “New FED Section 13 (3) Broad Based Federal Assistance to Swap Entities would be ok.” And here’s a direct link to the revised 13(3):
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h4173/text?version=eas&nid=t0:eas:9751
It doesn’t fundamentally change it.. seems to just adds some broad language that can easily be skirted (esp. in a “crisis” situation), new oversight/accountability measures, and a Treasury approval requirement.
I’ll be looking at this more, but I wanted to get it out there a.s.a.p. as everything is moving very fast now with financial reform. Thoughts?
Full post as published by Open Congress on June 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Traditional and Roth 401Ks
Selecting the right Retirement Plan
H&R Block Retirement Plan Fraud
How to Join Class Action Suit
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Ford F-150 Recall
alleging a hose in the F-150 and Lincoln Mark LT pickup trucks could affect braking power.
Cowboy Hat
Lincoln County pays citizen $10,500 settlement for Constitutional Rights violations.
Nortel
faces class action over changes to employee pension plan
Yellow Freight Pension Plan
alleging ERISA violations
Health Plan Boycott
Connecticut chiropractic groups to pay $87,000 fine in civil suit.
WaMu Cash Balance Pension Plan - Partial Preliminary Settlement
WaMu Cash Balance Pension Plan Partial Preliminary Settlement

Banks, Exchanges Seek to Influence Derivatives Reform
Blanche Lincolns excellent and doomed derivatives proposals
Derivatives Clearinghouses and Exchanges
Senate Agriculture Committee Considers Ban on Banks' Trading Financial Derivatives
Where Does Blanche Lincoln Go From Here
The (Re)regulation of Financial Derivatives








