Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> Pennsylvania Family Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Family Law
: Pennsylvania Family LawHIGH INCOME SUPPORT CASES ARE NOT AFFECTED BY SHARED PHYSICAL CUSTODY
By Fox Rothschild
Most child support cases in Pennsylvania are decided based upon the Pennsylvania Support Guidelines ("Guidelines") found at Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-3. The Guidelines are utilized for any case in which the parents’ combined net monthly income is $20,000 or less. The amount of support dictated by the Guidelines is subject to reduction if the parties have shared (50/50) physical custody or if the payor has substantial physical custody (at least 40% of overnights). The reduction in the child support payments for shared or substantial physical custody ranges from 10% to 20% of the payor’s proportionate share of the total support obligation. See Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-4.
Cases in which the parties’ combined net monthly income exceeds $20,000 are decided outside the Guidelines, based upon a formula set forth in the case of Melzer v. Witsberger, 480 A.2d 991 (Pa. 1984). In these high income cases, a presumptive minimum amount of support is established based upon the Guidelines. However, the actual support award may be higher, based, in large party, upon children’s reasonable expenses.
Although an automatic reduction in support is made in Guidelines cases based upon shared or substantial physical custody, the same reduction does not apply in high income support cases. The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently held that shared physical custody does not affect a Melzer calculation.
This recent Superior Court decision highlights the expense driven nature of cases decided under Melzer. Although case law instructs courts to be flexible in considering other factors in addition to expenses, under the shared physical custody arrangement in Bulgarelli, the court declined to deviate from the standard Melzer calculation. The parties’ and children’s expenses are the paramount focus of any Melzer analysis, not the custody schedule.
Full post as published by Pennsylvania Family Law on November 27, 2007 (boomark / email).
Child Support Orders
How to modify terms
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Child Support Survival Guide
The Child Support Enforcement System
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
Child Support Overview
Federal requires states to set guidelines for support.
Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas
ConAgra Peanut Butter
Hundreds of Salmonella Cases Settled
Sperm Donor
Ordered to Pay Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Immigrant Sedation
US Government awards two detainees $55,000 settlement after drugging them while in custody.

Joint or Shared Physical Custody
Child Custody - Physical versus Legal Custody
Means Test: Dont Give Up, Even If You Think Youve Flunked It, Part 10
What are Lawyer's Fees in Madison County, Indiana
San Jose Family Attorney Move-Away Contests in Child Custody Cases








