ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> IRS Problem Solver Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Taxation & Estate Planning

: IRS Problem Solver Blog

Retirement Homes to Pay Higher Taxes

By Darrin Mish

ADVERTISEMENTS

The IRS intends to collect on the billions of dollars of taxes that come from entrance fees retirement homes charge to the elderly who use their services. Some of these retirement homes are profit making organizations whereas others are non profits. For those that are profit making ones, they are taxed on their entrance fees themselves. For those that are non profit making, they are taxed on income derived from their entrance fees like fixed deposit interests.

Two cases in point are the Classic Residence by Hyatt which is a profit making retirement home and the Mission Ridge, a nonprofit retirement home. In both cases, the likely effect of taxation on their entrance fees and derived income will be an increase in their fees to the retirees who use the facilities. Generally, these homes can charge entrance fees anywhere from $250,000 to $2 million. This fee is generally refundable when the retirees leave the homes either through death or moving to another location.

It is not unusual for retirees to sell their homes and use the profits to pay for the entrance fees. When these retirees enter the community they usually start in an independent living arrangement where they enjoy living and nursing home care all within the same community.

The IRS claims that Classic Residence has been underpaying their taxes by $107 million over the years. On the other hand, Classic Residence themselves contend that their entrance fees should be classified as an interest free loan and thus should not be taxable. But if the IRS wins its claim then it would set a precedent on all other profit making retirement homes that number between 100 and 150 across the country.

In the case of Mission Ridge, their entrance fees are used as a form of collateral to back bonds. The IRS stand on this matter is that if the nonprofit retirement homes make more money in interest than it is due to pay on the bonds, then they should pay taxes on the profits from that interest. This is known as the ?arbitrage rule?.

Depending on the state of the economy, the retirement homes are likely to make a profit in the interest on their entrance fees. If the IRS wins this ruling, bonds for nonprofit retirement homes would be classed as a higher risk than they are now and would carry higher interest rates. Furthermore, the calculations that need to be done to maintain the necessary arbitrage records for the IRS would be very extensive.

The Mission Ridge case is also another precedent-setting one that is likely to affect several hundred other nonprofit retirement homes in the US.

Retirement Homes to Pay Higher Taxes is a post from: IRS Tax Problem Solver Blog - IRS Help

Post to Twitter

Full post as published by IRS Problem Solver Blog on June 15, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0331 secs (new cache)