Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> The Gavel
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Politics
: The GavelHouse Passes FISA Amendments Act
By Jesse Lee
The House has just passed the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 3773, to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes, by a vote of 213-197-1. The revised House legislation to amend FISA grants new authorities for conducting electronic surveillance against foreign targets while preserving the requirement that the government obtain an individualized FISA court order, based on probable cause, when targeting Americans at home or abroad. The House bill also strongly enhances oversight of the Administration?s surveillance activities. Finally, the House bill does not provide retroactive immunity for telecom companies but allows the courts to determine whether lawsuits should proceed.
Read more on the FISA Amendments Act in our current legislation section >>
Watch highlights of the debate >>
| Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “Why would the Administration oppose a judicial determination of whether the companies already have immunity? There are at least three explanations… None of these alternatives is attractive but they clearly demonstrate why the Administration?s insistence that Congress provide retroactive immunity has never been about national security or about concerns for the companies; it has always been about protecting the Administration.” |
Extended transcript:
Speaker Pelosi:?Why would the Administration oppose a judicial determination of whether the companies already have immunity? There are at least three explanations:
?First, the President knows that it was the Administration?s incompetence in failing to follow the procedures in statute that prevented immunity from being conveyed ? that?s one possibility. They simply didn?t do it right. Second, the Administration?s legal argument that the surveillance requests were lawfully authorized was wrong; or public reports that the surveillance activities undertaken by the companies went far beyond anything about which any Member of Congress was notified, as is required by the law.
?None of these alternatives is attractive but they clearly demonstrate why the Administration?s insistence that Congress provide retroactive immunity has never been about national security or about concerns for the companies; it has always been about protecting the Administration.?
Read Speaker Pelosi’s full speech: (more…)
Full post as published by The Gavel on March 14, 2008 (boomark / email).
House Closing
Sealing a home sale
School House Abuse
Selwyn House School agrees to $5 million teacher molestation settlement.
Nestle USA
Recalls Toll House Refrigerated Cookie Dough Products
Lighter Blamed in House Fire
Cricket Lighters settles $200,00 wrongful death lawsuit.
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...

House passes FISA legislation, 293-129
FISA legislation passes, 69-28; telecoms get immunity
President Signs FISA Amendments Act of 2008
House Passes ADA Amendments Act of 2008
House unanimously passes ADA amendments









