ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Writ of mandamus granted compelling employer to pay retiree for accrued vacation credits

ADVERTISEMENTS
Writ of mandamus granted compelling employer to pay retiree for accrued vacation credits
Matter of Sabatino v Suffolk County, 2010 NY Slip Op 04797, Decided on June 1, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department

From July 3, 1984, until December 31, 2003, Paul Sabatino II served as Counsel to the Suffolk County Legislature. He retired as Chief Deputy Suffolk County Executive, after 30 years of service to Suffolk County in various positions as a "managerial exempt employee."

Upon his retirement Suffolk County paid Sabatino for accrued vacation in the amount of 630 hours. Sabatino, however, contended that he was entitled to be paid for an additional 444 hours of accrued vacation time,* or a total of 1074 hours of credit.

Sabatino argued that the additional 444 hours of accrued vacation credit was due him, having been "previously approved" by Suffolk County Resolution No. 659 on January 1, 1989. When the County declined to pay him for these additional 444 hours of vacation credit, Sabatino filed a petition in the nature of mandamus** seeking a court order compelling the County to pay him the additional amount he claimed was due him.

Supreme Court granted Sabatino?s petition; the Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court?s action.

The Appellate Division said that Suffolk County Resolution No. 659 was subsequently enacted as Suffolk County Administrative Code §631-1(C). It provides that "Upon separation from County service by retirement, ? an exempt employee shall be granted payment by the County for unused vacation time for all unused vacation time accrued prior to December 31, 1988, which has vested in such exempt employee as of that date and remains unused at the time of separation ?."

In this instance, said the court, ?it is clear from the record? that, prior to the effective date of §631-1(C), Sabatino, then a member of the "legislative personnel" of Suffolk County, was granted written approval by the Presiding Officer of the County Legislature to carry over the 444 hours of his vacation credits. Accordingly, the Appellate Division held that consistent with the terms of §631-1(C), ?those 444 hours vested in him, and he was entitled to be paid for them upon his retirement from service with the County.?

The Court also commented that ?While a municipality's interpretation of its local laws is entitled to great deference, and its interpretation will be upheld if it is not irrational, unreasonable, or contrary to governing language,? in situations where the issue involved is one of the ?pure legal interpretation,? such deference is not required.

Ruling that Supreme Court properly determined that Sabatino satisfied the requirements of §631-1(C), the Appellate Division said that the County ?may not impose additional requirements which are not present? in the Code.

* The cash value of the 444 hours of the unused vacation accruals claimed by Sabatino: $40,221.97.

** The writ of mandamus is one of number of the ancient ?common law? writs and is granted by a court to compel an official to perform "acts that officials are duty-bound to perform." Other writs include the writ of prohibition ? a writ issued by a higher tribunal to a lower tribunal to "prohibit" the adjudication of a matter then pending before the lower tribunal on the grounds that the lower tribunal "lacked jurisdiction;" the writ of injunction - a judicial order preventing a public official from performing an act; the writ of "certiorari," compelling a lower court to send it record of a case to the higher tribunal for review by the higher tribunal; and the writ of ?quo warranto? [by what authority]. The Civil Practice Law and Rules sets out the modern equivalents of the surviving ancient writs.

The decision is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_04797.htm

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on June 09, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)