Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael GeistLiberals, NDP Both Focus on C-32 Digital Lock Provisions
By Michael Geist
ADVERTISEMENTS
Reaction from both the Liberals and NDP focus on C-32 digital lock provisions. Liberal critic Marc Garneau told CBC.ca that the bill seemed to be missing an exception that would allow people to break digital locks if it was for private, non-commercial use. Meanwhile, the NDP's Charlie Angus argued "the only rights you will get under this bill are those that U.S.-based entertainment concerns decide you get. If the technological protections override those rights, then you have no rights." Both MPs suggested that fast tracking the bill through summer hearings is not the right approach. Full post as published by Michael Geist on June 03, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Landlord Tenant Laws and Provisions
State and City Laws Related to Residential House and Apartment Leases
Lawsuits and Settlements
Apple Inc.
allegedly maintained an illegal monopoly on the digital music market.
Ford Focus
Consumer Class Action Settles for Cash Refunds
Texas, USA
alleging the Medical Malpractice and Tort Reform Act of 2003 violates several provisions of the Constitution.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Blawg of the Day -- Digital Copyright Canada
Now back away slowly from the caps-lock key.
Dreher: The heart of the marriage matter
The Need for Hold-Til-Retirement Provisions









