Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Supreme Court rules against NFL in antitrust case; The 9-0 ruling declares the teams are individual businesses and not a 'single entity' and leaves owners open to be sued if they conspire to restrict competition in the sale of merchandise"

"Supreme Court rules against NFL in antitrust case; The 9-0 ruling declares the teams are individual businesses and not a 'single entity' and leaves owners open to be sued if they conspire to restrict competition in the sale of merchandise": David G. Savage has this article today in The Los Angeles Times.

In today's edition of USA Today, Joan Biskupic has an article headlined "Court denies NFL antitrust exemption; Justices: Teams are separate enterprises."

The New York Times reports that "N.F.L. Fails in Its Request for Antitrust Immunity."

The Wall Street Journal reports that "Court Makes NFL Play Defense; Justices' 9-0 Ruling Says League Isn't Entitled to a Blanket Antitrust Exemption."

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court rules against NFL in merchandising antitrust case; The Supreme Court on Monday ruled unanimously that the NFL is not a single entity, but 32 different franchises, reversing an appeals court decision."

Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal reports that "High Court Broadsides NFL in Antitrust Case; The National Football League 'snatched defeat from the jaws of victory,' according to one antitrust expert."

From NPR, yesterday evening's broadcast of "All Things Considered" contained an audio segment entitled "Supreme Court Rules Against NFL In Antitrust Case" featuring Nina Totenberg. And today's broadcast of "Morning Edition" contained an audio segment entitled "High Court Rules Against NFL In Antitrust Case."

And at "SCOTUSblog," Lyle Denniston has a post titled "No antitrust 'Trojan horse.'"

Full post as published by How Appealing on May 25, 2010 (boomark / email).