Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

By Howard M. Friedman

In Barhite v. Caruso, (6th Cir., May 14, 2010), the 6th Circuit rejected a prisoners free exercise and RLUIPA claims objecting to prison officials confiscating from him numerous photos of scantily clad young women. Plaintiff failed to allege that the photos were related to the practice of his Mormon religion. Instead he essentially alleged an equal protection discrimination claim, asserting that the photos were taken from him shortly after raids on an FLDS compound in Texas. However, he failed to allege that non-Mormon sex offenders were permitted to have similar photos.

In Burchett v. Bromps, (9th Cir., May 21, 2010), the 9th Circuit held that plaintiff should be permitted to amend his pleadings to pursue an Establishment Clause claim against the Washington state community corrections officer supervising the community-placement portion of his criminal sentence. Plaintiff alleged that the officer prohibited him from attending a Seventh Day Adventist Church and granted him permission to attend only an Assembly of God church.

In Robinson v. Delgado, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47818 (ND CA, May 13, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge permitted an inmate who was a member of the House of Yahweh Yadhaim religion, to proceed with his claim that he should be permitted a kosher diet, and that the prison's vegetarian meals are not kosher.

In Perezo v. Williams, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48248 (ND TX, May 17, 2010), a Texas federal court dismissed a frivolous an inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were violated because he is not permitted to take his Bible with him into the recreation yard for his one hour of recreation.

In Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48969 (D SD, May 18, 2010), a South Dakota federal district court held that plaintiff organization lacks standing to bring a suit under RLUIPA challenging the decision to remove tobacco from Native American ceremonies in the South Dakota State Penitentiary.

In Eichler v. Tilton, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48623 (ED CA, April 21, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge held that an inmate needs to amend his complaint to clarify his claim that his religious rights are being infringed when prison officials refused to permit him to practice yoga.

In Gordon v. Caruso, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49430 (WD MI, May 19,2010), a Michigan federal district court refused to dismiss claims by an inmate who was a member of the white-supremacist Asatru faith that his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA were violated when officials prohibited Asatru group worship. Defendants had not shown that there were no less restrictive alternatives available to deal with officials' concerns.

In Sandeford v. Plummer, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49315 (ND CA, April 26, 2010), a California federal district court refused to grant a prisoner's motion for reconsideration of the court's previous summary judgement against him (see prior posting) on his complaints of being denied an Islamic diet, of improper observances of Ramadan and Eid, denial of an imam for spiritual guidance and refusing to allow him to wear a Kufi prayer cap.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on May 23, 2010 (boomark / email).