Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> StandDown Texas Project
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: StandDown Texas ProjectBryan Stevenson on Today's Graham Ruling
By Steve Hall
ADVERTISEMENTS
Bryan Stevenson, Director of the Equal Justice Initiative, argued the companion case, Sullivan v. Florida in the Supreme Court. EJI has issued a news release, "Court Strikes Down LWOP for Juvenile Non-Homicide. Decision Called 'A Significant Victory for Children'." Here's an excerpt:The U.S. Supreme Court today issued an historic ruling in Graham v. Florida that holds life-without-parole sentences for juveniles convicted of non-homicide offenses unconstitutional. Terrance Graham, sentenced to life without parole at 17, is now entitled to a resentencing hearing. Dozens of other juveniles sentenced to life without parole are now entitled to relief, including Joe Sullivan, whose case also was argued on this issue...continue to full postFull post as published by StandDown Texas Project on May 17, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Katrina Victims See Justice, Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Katrina Victims See Justice Ruling Paves the Way for Class Actions
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Congrats to this years Gruber Justice Prize
happy 60th birthday to John Stevenson
Who killed Teriyonna Stevenson
Graham crackers: reflecting on Eighth Amendment rules versus standard and subconstitutional echoes








