ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Research Blogs -> Slaw.ca

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Research

: Slaw.ca

A New Vote on Abortion?

By Omar Ha-Redeye

ADVERTISEMENTS

Between the government’s withdrawal of funding for NGOs that provide maternal health programs overseas, and a proclaimed emphasis on maternal health at the upcoming G8, some in Canada are wondering if we’re heading to a new vote on abortion.

Liberal MP Paul Szabo of Mississauga South says,

Is (a vote) inevitable? I would say yes.

If such a vote was held today, what would the outcome be?

Szabo is a member of the secret Parliamentary Pro-Life Caucus, whose membership remains unknown. Although it’s often presumed that the group is dominated by Conservatives, a closer look shows that these positions do cross partisan lines.

The Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada has complied a list of our 308 MPs and where they stand on the abortion issue, and the picture is still unclear. Although the number of pro-life MPs rose slightly due to Conservative MPs after the 2008 election, the real increase is in the number of MPs whose stance on the issue is unknown, rising from 56 MPs before 2008 to 64 MPs after.

MPs Before 2008 Election After 2008 Election
Total Anti-choice MPs 123 (40%) 120 (39%)
- Conservative Party 95 of 127 (75%) 99 of 143 (69%)
- Liberal Party 26 of 95 (27%) 19 of 77 (25%)
- Independent 2 2
Total Pro-Choice MPs 125* (41%) 124* (40%)
Total MPs with unknown stance 56 (18%) 64 (21%)
Total MPs 304 308

The criteria for determining an MPs stance are more interesting.  The first includes public statements on the issue, which is probably the least controversial.

The second is whether they opposed the Order of Canada for Dr. Morgentaler. Keep in mind that even the Chief Justice received a complaint over this touchy topic.  An attempt to pass a bill after R. v. Morgentaler failed at Senate, leaving a legislative gap (but see s. 287 of the Criminal Code).

The third criteria was whether the MP voted in favour of Bill C-484 Unborn Victims of Crime Act on March 5, 2008. The Coalition does not that some pro-choice MPs did vote in favour of Bill C-484, which reveals the uncertainties in predicting a politician’s stance on such a divisive policy.

What we do know is that the majority of Conservative MPs do appear pro-life, and after the passing of p-207 at the 2008 Conservative Party of Canada convention, fetal rights is an official policy of the party.  Although some Liberals seem intent to capitalize on the abortion issue, most would rather not have an election over it.

Regardless of whether it does go to an election, a vote on abortion could be one of the most divisive and controversial bills in Canada for some time, resurrecting what has been considered a settled issue in Canada for 25-years.

Full post as published by Slaw.ca on May 16, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)