ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS


Franken Amendment Approved Directing SEC to Set Up SRO to Assign Credit Ratings on Rotating Basis

The Senate approved an amendment to the financial reform bill that seeks to end the conflicts of interest in the prevalent issuer pays model of credit rating agencies. Sponsored by Senator Al Franken, the amendment creates a board overseen by the SEC that will assign credit rating agencies to provide initial ratings on a rotating basis in order to eliminate inherent conflicts of interest. Currently, firms choose which credit rating agencies will rate the quality of their securities and other financial products.

The SEC will create a Credit Rating Agency Board, a self-regulatory organization, tasked with developing a system in which the Board assigns a rating agency to provide a product?s initial rating. Requiring an initial credit rating by an agency not of the issuer?s choosing will put a check on the accuracy of ratings, in the Senator?s view. The amendment does not prohibit an issuer from then seeking a second or third or fourth rating from an agency of their choosing

The amendment leaves flexibility to the Board to determine the assignment process. Thus, the Board gets to design the assignment process it sees fit, which can be random or based on a formula, just as long as the issuer doesn?t get to choose.The Board will select a subset of credit rating agencies to be eligible for the assignment pool. The Board will be required to monitor the performance of the agencies in the pool. If the Board so chooses, it can reward good performance with more rating assignments. It can recognize poor performance with fewer rating assignments. If the rater is bad enough, that might even be zero assignments.

The rotating system of assigning credit ratings is designed to reduce forum shopping and, in the Senator?s opinion, gets to the root of the conflict of interest problem with rating agencies. By allowing an SRO to assign more work to rating agencies that produce accurate ratings, he reasoned, will allow the market to reward accuracy and increase true competition and enhance faith in the rating process. Cong. Record, May 10, 2010, S3465.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on May 13, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0124 secs (new cache)