Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Religion Clause

Religion & Law

: Religion Clause

Remedies Imposed In Muslim Charity's Challenge To Terrorist Designation

By Howard M. Friedman

In KindHearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, Inc. v. Geithner, (ND OH, May 10, 2010), an Ohio federal district court issued an opinion on the appropriate remedy in a Muslim charity's challenge to the procedures used by the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control in designating the charity a Global Terrorist Group. Last August, the court held that the government should have obtained a search warrant; that OFAC had applied vague criteria and did not give the charity adequate notice and opportunity to be heard; and had improperly blocked access to funds for KindHearts to use to pay its counsel. (See prior posting.) In October it issued a preliminary injunction against further action pending the cout's decision on a remedy. (See prior posting.) This week, in fashioning a remedy, the court refused to invalidate the order blocking KindHearts' assets, and instead decided to hold a post-seizure probable cause review as a remedy for the warrantless seizure and continuing retention of KindHearts' assets. At the hearing the government will be required to show that it had reasonable ground to believe that KindHearts was subject to designation as a terrorist group. Also it may cure its Fourth Amendment violation by showing probable cause for the original seizure.

As to the failure to give notice and opportunity to be heard, the court imposed as a remedy a remand. The court will hold an ex parte, in camera meeting with the government to decide what classified evidence will give KindHearts adequate notice. It also remanded to the Office of Foreign Asset Control for further consideration the issue of payment of attorneys' fees from blocked assets. IPS reports on the decision.

Full post as published by Religion Clause on May 13, 2010 (boomark / email).