ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Truth on the Market

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Truth on the Market

More Details on the OFT’s Botched Prosecution of British Airways

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here (HT: Danny Sokol).   The post by Andreas Stephan implies that the OFT’s mistakes in the BA prosecution threaten to undermine the effectiveness of cartel enforcement in the UK generally and predicts that the OFT will not bring more criminal prosecutions in the near future.   Stephan also provides some more detail on what apparently went wrong:

The remarkable failure by OFT prosecutors to disclose key documents to the defence, betrays their inexperience in criminal proceedings and suggests a complacent overreliance on the whistleblowing party, Virgin Atlantic, in building their case. Virgin?s lawyers were apparently given the responsibility of uncovering evidence, but failed to produce some key documents to the OFT until the trial had started, having previously indicated the files were corrupted… .

As previously noted on the CCP blog, pursuing the BA case showed poor judgement by the OFT. The alleged conduct here was never a sophisticated hardcore cartel, but rather informal contacts between businessmen. The case thus hinged on emails and telephone calls largely produced as a result of Virgin?s cooperation with the regulator. When Virgin?s lawyers eventually produced the additional email evidence, including one communication suggesting a rise in fuel surcharges occurred before any communication took place between the airlines, the case became dead in the water.  The defendants now appear as innocent victims of the OFT?s overzealous enforcement; compounded by BA?s decision to stick by Andrew Crawley, even promoting him to Sales and Marketing Director.

If accurate, these developments certainly do not inspire confidence in the OFT’s role as prosecutor, but I’m skeptical of arguments that the entire deterrent value of criminal sanctions is at stake here.   Maybe so.  These developments certainly don’t help.  And such mistakes are potentially more costly in countries like the UK trying to establish a so-called “culture of competition.”  But I suspect the OFT will be back to business quickly and that it will not require much in the way of dolling out serious criminal sanctions to produce deterrent value.

Print
posted in antitrust by Josh Wright Leave A Comment

Full post as published by Truth on the Market on May 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0143 secs (new cache)