ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The FRAUDfiles Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The FRAUDfiles Blog

Minkow Anti-SLAPP motion filed in Medifast case

By Tracy Coenen

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Medifast Inc. litigation over its multi-level marketing division Take Shape For Life (TSFL), and the criticism of it by me, Barry Minkow, Fraud Discovery Institute, William Lobdell, Robert FitzPatrick, and an anonymous message board poster who referred to the company’s board chairman Bradley McDonald as “Pimp Daddy Brad” marches on.

About a week ago, Robert FitzPatrick and I filed our anti-SLAPP motions with the court. This week Barry Minkow and Fraud Discovery Institute filed their anti-SLAPP motion with the court.

Medifast seems to be getting nervous and desperate. Their lawyers have been shamelessly lying to the court, and are trying all sorts of neat tricks to stall the anti-SLAPP motions. They now claim that they need all sorts of discovery done before they can reply to the anti-SLAPP motions.

The one curious thing that Medifast hasn’t done, is they haven’t pointed out even one false statement by any of the defendants. Their entire defamation case is based on supposed false statements by all of us. And Medifast would be in sole possession of the proof of the falsehood of our statements, yet they haven’t bothered to mention even one of these false statements. They’ve been saying for over a year that we’re lying about TSFL, but haven’t come forth with even one example.

I have plenty more to say about Medifast, their business model, and their litigation tactics. Unfortunately, due to the lawsuit pending, the less I say, the better. Even in a free country, it appears that the First Amendment rights of people can be trampled by corporate bullies like Medifast who will sue those who dare to challenge them.

If they’re so sure of their claims… and if we’ve told lies about them… and if they can prove it… why not proceed with the anti-SLAPP motions? Probably because the longer Medifast can drag this out and the more they cost the defendants in legal fees, the better their chances of shutting us up (and also shutting up any other citizen who dares to challenge the validity of the multi-level marketing business model).

Full post as published by The FRAUDfiles Blog on May 07, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0256 secs (new cache)