ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: The Volokh Conspiracy

Disagreement Need Not Equal Discourtesy

By Eugene Volokh

ADVERTISEMENTS
(Eugene Volokh)

Some of the comments to my post on why it?s not discourteous to wear American flag images on Cinco de Mayo seem to suggest there?s something discourteous about publicly expressing disagreement with some other group?s celebration, even in a public space. Here?s an example:

My college, did in fact, have a kind of celebrate Israeli independence day (more like a week). Some of our non-Jewish/pro=Palestinian students suddenly started wearing the scarves that, apparently, signify a pro-Palestinian/anti-Israeli view. 

I think that was rude of them. I think it was an intentional insult to the Jewish [or, at least, pro-Israel] students: they intended to insult and undercut the celebrations of some of their peers. I would think the same if students wore swastikas on Holocaust Remembrance Day.

I think this is also part of what Maureen Downey, the columnist to whose post I was responding, had in mind. But I think it?s mistaken.

There?s nothing at all rude when students who see some expressing Israeli independence day express an anti-Israel viewpoint. That?s disagreement, but disagreement does not equal discourtesy. Nor does the fact that the disagreement comes in response to others? celebration make the disagreement discourteous, at least when the celebration is in a public place. If some people want to celebrate an event in a public place, others who share the place are entitled to express the view that the event doesn?t merit celebration. 

That?s part of the nature of the contest of ideas (though here expressed by both sides symbolically rather than through detailed argument). There?s nothing inherently discourteous about this contest, at least if it?s carried out through means that avoid insults, intrusions on truly solemn events, and the like.

Likewise, another commenter suggests that it?s discourteous to ?eat[] a hot dog at a vegan club meeting.? If you go to a private meeting as a guest, then your obligations as a guest are indeed greater. But if the vegan club sponsors an ?Eat Vegan? day in a public place, where they conspicuously eat only vegan food, then it is not discourteous for others to use the occasion to eat hot dogs.

Swastikas on Holocaust Remembrance Day are of course a completely different matter, partly because of the solemnity of the occasion but especially because swastikas represent evil. But that has nothing to do with the American flag on Cinco de Mayo.


Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on May 06, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0132 secs (new cache)