Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogBone on Dworkin on Procedure & Participation
By Lawrence Solum
ADVERTISEMENTS
Robert G. Bone (University of Texas School of Law) has posted Procedure, Participation, Rights (Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:-
This essay is a contribution to a symposium on Professor Ronald Dworkin?s forthcoming book, JUSTICE FOR HEDGEHOGS. The essay focuses on the idea of procedural rights. It asks whether procedural rights make sense in American civil litigation, where ?right? is understood in the Dworkinian sense of limiting, resisting, or trumping arguments based on furthering a collective social goal or improving aggregate welfare. Professor Dworkin addressed this question in a wonderfully rich and provocative essay published in the early 1980s, entitled ?Principle, Policy, Procedure.? I take a critical look at Professor Dworkin?s argument and use the opportunity to explore why it so difficult to articulate a coherent theory of procedural rights. In particular, Part I of my essay argues that the best interpretation of American civil adjudication is likely to recognize procedural rights with a curious property: the right must be defined at its core in a way that somehow yields to arguments of high social cost at the same time as resisting those arguments in the way a right is supposed to do. Part II describes Professor Dworkin?s theory, explains how it meets the definitional challenge, and criticizes its main elements. Part III examines two competing theories of procedural rights and explains why they are also problematic. The essay concludes by calling for more work on the nature of procedural rights in civil litigation. There is much at stake. If there is no coherent account of procedural rights, then radical reforms justified on utilitarian grounds should receive much more favorable attention than they have to date.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on May 05, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
FDA
Life-Threatening Complications Associated with Recombinant Human Bone Graft Products
Medtronic's Infuse Bone Graft
allegedly linked to life-threatening complications.
Calaxo Bone Screw
allegedly recalled for causing injuries and side effects.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Prof. Bone Posts Article on the Need for Procedure Theory
What are the possible side-effects of bisphosphonate treatment







