ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> CalBizLit

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: CalBizLit

Huge California Asbestos Verdict

By Bruce Nye

ADVERTISEMENTS

Ah yes, there will always be Los Angeles juries.  And one of them came back last week with this verdict in a mesothelioma case against Certainteed Corporation, former Certainteed manufacturer of pipe made with crocidolite, the most virulently dangerous asbestos fiber:

    Compensatory damages:  $8.8 million

    Punitive damages:             $200 million

Wow.  To paraphrase the quote often attributed to the late Everett Dirksen (who apparently never said it), "$200 million here, $200 million there, pretty soon you're talking real money."

Plaintiff Rhoda Evans' husband worked at the LA Department of Water and Power for twenty years cutting the asbestos pipe.  She laundered his clothing, and allegedly became ill from exposure to asbestos fibers and dust that came home with him. 

Mesothelioma personal injury cases usually involve plaintiffs with very short life expectancies.  Therefore, they are typically granted preference for trial, and this case was no exception.  Trial started less than seven months after the complaint was filed. 

Department of Water and Power was also at the trial, but had a sliding scale settlement Ladwp agreement:    DWP would stay in the case, and if the jury found it 0 - 3% at fault, it would pay the plaintiff's $600,000, if 3.1% - 4% at fault, $800,000, and if 4.1% or more, $975,000.  As it turned out, the jury allocated 30% of the liability to DWP, but did not assess punitive damages against it (and of course, plaintiff did not seek punitives against DWP).  Because of California's complex rules for calculating set-offs from prior settlements (of which there were many), we can't tell yet whether DWP benefited from its settlement or not.

You can see a segment from plaintiff attorney Bill Levin's opening statement here, courtesy of Courtroom View Network.  California Punitive Damages also has coverage here.

Full post as published by CalBizLit on May 04, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0188 secs (new cache)