ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IPKat

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IPKat

Iberians struggle in Luxembourg

By Jeremy

ADVERTISEMENTS
Curia reports today that the Commission of the European Communities is bringing proceedings against the Republic of Portugal in Case C-24/08 for failing to implement Directive 2004/48 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the enforcement of intellectual property rights --or, just in case Portugal has implemented it, for not telling the Commission that it has done so.

Left: never mind IP enforcement, this Portuguese technical prevention measure has a built-in deterrent effect. Just drop your computer into the bath with one of these swimming about and no hacker go near it ...

Says the Curia notice, "The period prescribed for transposing the Directive into national law expired on 29 April 2004". That's a bit hard on the Portuguese. For everyone else it seems that Article 20 ("Implementation") says:

"1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 29 April 2006 . They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof".
The IPKat asks his Portuguese readers: have you really not implemented my favourite enforcement directive -- or did you only forget to tell the Commission? Post your answers below or email me here.


Meanwhile, on the larger chunk of the Iberian peninsula, things haven't been going so well for the Spanish either. Judgment in Case C-32/07 Commission v Spain was posted on the Curia website this morning too. Says the Court,

" by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/84 ... on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive".
Merpel says, being a kultured kat, I've a question for you. What is the connection between this lovely portrait and the failure of Spain to implement Directive 2001/84? There are no prizes, because this is either something you know or something you don't. But if you do, then let me know by email here.

Full post as published by IPKat on March 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0022 secs (from cache 11/07/26 02:02:47)