ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal News

: FindLaw's Common Law

Will Santa Clara County Ban Toys in Kid's Meals?

ADVERTISEMENTS

Which is better, a Chicken McNuggets Happy Meal or the toy inside?

Soon, any debate on that question will be a moot point in Santa Clara County, California. There, lawmakers have passed a bill that sets required nutritional standards for kids' meals. Restaurants, such as McDonalds are prohibited from giving away Happy Meal toys unless they are given with a meal that satisfies nutritional standards.

Depending upon who you ask, the law is either a long-overdue way to reduce childhood obesity, or another example of unwanted nanny-state interference.

Recently on CNN.com, a non-scientific poll was featured, asking: Should toys be banned from fast food kids' meals that are high in calories, fat, salt and sugar?

At the time of writing this post, 166,329 people had voted, with 53% of the voters choosing "No" and 47% choosing "Yes."

As Reuters reports, the opinions on the matter are as divided as the poll indicates.

"This ordinance levels the playing field....It helps parents make the choices they want for their children without toys and other freebies luring them toward food that fails to meet basic nutritional standards," said Ken Yeager, president of Santa Clara County's Board of Supervisors.

"Ultimately, parents decide what their children eat and whether a meal includes a toy or not -- that is the role of a parent," Jot Condie, president of the California Restaurant Association, told Reuters. "The county government does not need to serve as the parent of the parents," she continued.

The law will not go into effect until it undergoes a second reading on May 11. Restaurants will then have 90 days to make the necessary changes and an opportunity to propose alternatives.

Related Resources:


Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on May 03, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0187 secs (new cache)