Personal Injury Law

Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filed after Doctor Unnecessarily Removes Man?s Kidney

By Steven M. Levin and John J. Perconti

A man and his wife have claimed that an urologist has unnecessarily removed the man?s kidney. The two filed a lawsuit in Madison County Circuit Court against the doctor and the Urology Consultants. The doctor had negligently performed a radical nephrectomy on the victim. The medical malpractice lawsuit claims that the doctor should have attempted to perform an exploratory surgery or a partial nephrectomy. Instead, the doctor performed a surgery that fully removed the kidney.

As a result of this surgery, the medical malpractice victim is suffering permanent pain, mental anguish and disfigurement. He is also claiming economic losses of medical costs and lost wages. He also believes that he is prevented from attending to the usual duties and affairs of life. His wife is filing suit claiming that she lost her husband?s love, companionship, consortium and support because of the medical negligence. The Illinois medical malpractice is seeking a judgment of more than $300,000. To read more about this medical malpractice lawsuit, please click this link.

Radical nephrectomy involves removing the entire kidney, a section of the tube leading to the bladder, the gland that sits atop the kidney and the fatty tissue surrounding the kidney. On the other hand in a partial nephrectomy, only the diseased or infected portion of the kidney is removed. In this case, the medical malpractice victim would have benefited from a closer examination to determine which procedure was right for him. If you believe that you have been a victim of medical negligence, consult a Chicago medical malpractice attorney.

Full post as published by Illinois Medical Malpractice Blog on April 26, 2010 (boomark / email).