Academic

ANTHRAX UPDATE: I missed this the other day: Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect. A?

By Glenn Reynolds

ANTHRAX UPDATE: I missed this the other day: Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect.

A former Army microbiologist who worked for years with Bruce E. Ivins, whom the F.B.I. has blamed for the anthrax letter attacks that killed five people in 2001, told a National Academy of Sciences panel on Thursday that he believed it was impossible that the deadly spores had been produced undetected in Dr. Ivins?s laboratory, as the F.B.I. asserts.

Asked by reporters after his testimony whether he believed that there was any chance that Dr. Ivins, who committed suicide in 2008, had carried out the attacks, the microbiologist, Henry S. Heine, replied, ?Absolutely not.? At the Army?s biodefense laboratory in Maryland, where Dr. Ivins and Dr. Heine worked, he said, ?among the senior scientists, no one believes it.?

Dr. Heine told the 16-member panel, which is reviewing the F.B.I.?s scientific work on the investigation, that producing the quantity of spores in the letters would have taken at least a year of intensive work using the equipment at the army lab. Such an effort would not have escaped colleagues? notice, he added later, and lab technicians who worked closely with Dr. Ivins have told him they saw no such work.

I definitely get the impression that the feds have been more interested in pinning this on someone so they could close the case, than in actually getting to the bottom of things.

Full post as published by Instapundit.com on April 25, 2010 (boomark / email).