ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Employment Advisory

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: Employment Advisory

By Rod Stephens

ADVERTISEMENTS
Interviewing the Accused

Workplace investigations can place employers in the awkward position of having to ferret out the truth between two parties, each of whom appears credible. For that reason, many employers choose not to conduct an investigation or, worse, they interview the reporting party without interviewing the accused and corroborating witnesses. Simply put, there is no excuse for not conducting a workplace investigation once an employee has placed your company on notice of a potential harassment or discrimination claim or of a major policy violation that could result in termination.

In my last entry regarding investigations, I discussed how to interview the reporting party. This week, I would like to discuss the interview of the accused and co-worker witnesses. These are my six (6) steps:

1. Assess the scope of the investigation. Once you have interviewed the reporting party, take time to assess who you feel will have to be interviewed and how long you anticipate the interview process will take.

2. Assess the work place dynamic. Find someone in management that is familiar with the area in which the complaint arose and have them give you their sense of who is popular, who is held in high regard, and who has a reputation for not being able to keep a confidence.

3. Determine the order of interviews. In general, the tendency is to interview the reporting party, the accused, and then coworker witnesses. There are circumstances when it may make sense to interview coworker witnesses before the accused is interviewed or to interview witnesses in a certain order. This is particularly the case when there is a concern that the accused may be able to assert influence over potential witnesses.

4. Be impartial. The reporting party may have leveled serious allegations that, based on your interview, may have predisposed you to believe the allegations. Never the less, you will not know the true facts until you have had an opportunity to interview all the witnesses.

5. Discuss the issues with in-house or outside legal counsel. In many instances, experienced employment law counsel can help you focus on which issues are of importance so you can structure your interviews accordingly.

6. Read my January 4, 2007 blog entry on the ?7 Steps to a Successful Investigation.?

Next week: Concluding the Investigation.

Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice or to form an attorney client relationship. The information provided is general in nature. Nothing can substitute for a consultation with a legal professional who can address your particular legal concern.

Full post as published by Employment Advisory on January 18, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)