ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Discriminations

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Discriminations

What?s Black And White And Red All Over?

ADVERTISEMENTS

According to eminent Harvard sociologist Orlando Patterson in a New York Times OpEd today, it?s the red phone in Hillary?s 3 a.m. ad. After ?[r]epeated watching of the ad on YouTube,? Patterson writes,

I realized that I had only too often in my study of America?s racial history seen images much like these, and the sentiments to which they allude.

I am not referring to the fact that the ad is unoriginal; as several others have noted, it mimics a similar ad made for Walter Mondale in his 1984 campaign for the Democratic nomination. What bothers me is the difference between this and the Mondale ad. The Mondale ad directly and unequivocally played on the issue of experience. The danger was that the red telephone might be answered by someone who was ?unsure, unsteady, untested.? Why do I believe this? Because the phone and Mr. Mondale are the only images in the ad. Fair game in the normal politics of fear.
....
I have spent my life studying the pictures and symbols of racism and slavery, and when I saw the Clinton ad?s central image ? innocent sleeping children and a mother in the middle of the night at risk of mortal danger ? it brought to my mind scenes from the past. I couldn?t help but think of D. W. Griffith?s ?Birth of a Nation,? the racist movie epic that helped revive the Ku Klux Klan, with its portrayal of black men lurking in the bushes around white society. The danger implicit in the phone ad ? as I see it ? is that the person answering the phone might be a black man, someone who could not be trusted to protect us from this threat.

Patterson?s OpEd is a good example of the lunacy of today?s overheated, hair-trigger racial sensitivity. (Oops! Will Patterson think that ?hair-trigger? a ?racist sub-message? reference to black crime?) If we continue to go down this road pretty soon people will be bring charges of racist workplace harassment against co-workers who bring books to work with titles they don?t like.

Oh, wait

Full post as published by Discriminations on March 11, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0119 secs (new cache)