ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Prawfs

Of Banks, Buy-Outs, and Brontosaurs

By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel

ADVERTISEMENTS

Although major financial reform now looks like it will happen, there doesn't seem to be any plan to reduce the size of the largest financial players.  What brings this within my purview is that one proposal for curbing bank size is the so-called "bank tax," such as the one sketched out recently by International Monetary Fund staff.  Actually, the IMF calls it an "FAT," which is supposedly short for "financial activities tax," but let's just agree now to call it the "fat-cat" tax.

The idea is that the fat-cat tax is basically a pigouvian tax on excess risk.  To the extent that financial institutions earn excess profits by disregarding the risk they generate for other parties, the fat-cat tax recoups those "rents."  So a bank that is profitable because it knows it is "too big to fail" and so takes dangerous risks will pay back a large share of those profits, perhaps also giving it incentives to become smaller and safer.

I'm down with that, but this story totally fails to mention the dinosaurs.  Why were plant-eating dinosaurs so honking big?  Imagine the mega-tons of plants they had to eat every day just to move around.  One possible answer is that being ginormous also made them hard to kill: there weren't that many predators big enough to bring them down.  The same is true of firms.  An important source of "discipline" for managers is the possibility that, if they do a bad job, the firm will be bought out and they'll be sacked.  But really big firms are very tough to buy -- they require massive amounts of leverage (and therefore massive amounts of risk) to acquire.  So bank managers have lots of incentives to get too big, even aside from the systemic risk / "too big to fail" problem.  The fat-cat tax would help slim down the banks, and maybe make them better governed, too.

Disclaimer  about the subject line for dinosaur geeks: yes, I know we're supposed to call it the "apatosaurus' now.  But come on, that name stinks.  "Apatosaurus" sounds like a cute little critter you'd pat on the head while it nuzzled you.  A brontosaurus makes you tremble in awe.  Which is how I prefer my thunder lizards, thank you.   

Full post as published by Prawfs on April 22, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0145 secs (new cache)