Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Blog of Rights
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: Blog of RightsIs Facebook Having Another Privacy Disconnect?
By Chris Conley, ACLU of Northern California
The very first sentence on Facebook's privacy guide page states: "You should have control over what you share."
That seems fairly simple, doesn't it?
But many of Facebook's recent actions, such as its much-criticized "privacy transition," have made it harder for users to retain control over their information. Is this week more of the same?
Earlier this week, following up on its recent policy changes, Facebook announced its plans to create more dynamic profiles using "Connections." What exactly counts as a connection wasn't clearly defined either time, but seems to include things like friends lists, likes and interests, events, groups, and activities. (Today's announcement of the Social Graph API includes News Feed, Wall, Notes, Photos, and Videos as "connections" too, but Facebook may be overusing the word to mean different things.)
More importantly, it also isn't clear whether users will have real control over how their connections are shared. Both Facebook's Monday announcement and its recent policy changes have suggested that users cannot prevent applications, pages, and other third parties from accessing these connections. (They may be able to "hide" them from other Facebook users, but not from the government, advertisers, or anyone else with the ability and incentive to create apps or pages.) However, today's new documents for developers point to the Extended Permissions page that requires that applications and pages to explicitly ask the user before accessing various "connections," including interests, events, groups, and location.
If Facebook believes that you "should have control over what you share," it should resolve this by giving users real control over whether their connections can be accessed by apps and pages. Doing so still won't resolve other issues, like the "app gap" that allows your friends' applications to view your personal information without your knowledge or consent, but it would be one step in the right direction.
Otherwise, the only way you can keep control of your information is to refuse to use Facebook to share or connect at all. And that's not what we mean by control.
So don't let Facebook take away control over your personal information! Tell Facebook that you want to have control over your friends, groups, events, and interests so that you — and not Facebook, the government, or anyone else — chooses how and when they are shared!
Demand control of your personal information — Demand Your dotRights!
Full post as published by Blog of Rights on April 21, 2010 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Landlord Entry Right and Tenant Privacy
When can a landlord enter a rented dwelling
Facebook / Blockbuster
alleging that Facebook distributed your Blockbuster movie rental information without your knowledge or consent.
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
Google Sued for Violating the Privacy Rights of Millions of Americans
AOL Privacy Class Action
Can Proceed
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
Facebook
Downloading Games Linked to Possible Identity Theft

Privacy Poked & Pwnd Part IV: Facebook, Again
Facebook Finding Under Canada's Privacy Law: Adequate Safeguards Not in Place
Assessing Facebook's New Privacy Controls
Privacy Commissioner Launches New Facebook Investigation
Privacy Commissioner Expected To Release Facebook Compromise Today








