Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense LawyersFirst Circuit Quietly Enters a Booker Remand in Antonakopoulos
By Tom Lincoln
ADVERTISEMENTS
In United States v. Antonakopoulos, No. 03-1384, 2005 WL 407365, at *4 (1st Cir. Feb. 22, 2005), the First Circuit, after rejecting all of the Blakely/Booker claims actually raised by defendant on direct appeal, stated as follows: There is another type of Booker argument available but which Antonakopoulos has not made: that there is a reasonable probability that the district court, freed of mandatory guidelines, would have given him a lower sentence. Because this case establishes the standard for such a claim, we think it fairer to give Antonakopoulos and his counsel time to consider whether he wishes to advance the argument. If so, the prosecution must have a chance to respond. At sentencing the defendant sought a downward departure based in part on the fact that his son was brain damaged and he had been his son's caretaker...continue to full postFull post as published by Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers on March 22, 2005 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

CA1: a further remand for time-served and parsimony issues
DC CIrcuit notes, then avoids, circuit split over ex post facto Booker issue
CA1: individualized loss determinations, Booker, and ID theft
Ninth Circuit issues long-awaited en banc opinion on post-Booker universe
Split Third Circuit ruling on guideline calculation errors after Booker
Another notable discussion of Booker ex post issues









