Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing

Litigation

: How Appealing

"Justices Void Law Banning Videos of Animal Cruelty"

"Justices Void Law Banning Videos of Animal Cruelty": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news update.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined "Supreme Court voids law aimed at banning animal cruelty videos."

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has a news update headlined "Justices cite free speech in striking down animal-cruelty law; The Supreme Court overturns a law that makes it illegal to sell depictions of animal cruelty; The ruling is a setback for the animal-rights movement."

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has a news update headlined "Supreme Court Strikes Down Prohibition on Depictions of Animal Cruelty."

James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court strikes down animal cruelty law."

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that "Animal 'Crush Video' Law Voided by U.S. Supreme Court."

And at "SCOTUSblog," Lyle Denniston has a post titled "First Amendment left intact; Animal cruelty videos escape ban."

Full post as published by How Appealing on April 20, 2010 (boomark / email).