Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> The Volokh Conspiracy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: The Volokh ConspiracyNever a Good Way to Start Your Argument
By Eugene Volokh
ADVERTISEMENTS
(Eugene Volokh) From a brief quoted in Duffy v. Lusk, 2010 WL 1433481 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Apr. 8):
POINT I: THIS [IS] NOT AN INSANE LAWSUIT BROUGHT IN IGNORANCE OF ROOKER-FELDMAN PRINCIPLES OR JUDICIAL OR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.
I should note that petitioner, while acting pro se, is a lawyer.
Copyright © 2010
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. )
Full post as published by The Volokh Conspiracy on April 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Fallacious Argument of the Month: meet the straw man
Ocean Grove and Why No Religious Case for Gay Marriage
oral argument: a bouquet of links
SCOTUS Hears Oral Argument in Altria Group v. Good
Bankruptcy Does Not Exempt Cars Because You Need Car To Get To Work








