ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Capital Defense Weekly
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Capital Defense Weeklythis week’s edition
By Karl R. Keys, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
I’ve been ordered to trial so this week’s edition is a little lighter than usual. From this week’s edition:
A small cacophony of favorable opinions leads off this week. The California Supreme Court in People v. Superior Court (Pearson) holds that, despite Proposition 115, section 1054.9 is valid because that proposition governs only pretrial discovery and does not prohibit postconviction discovery of the kind envisioned by section 1054.9 . The Seventh Circuit in Eric Holmes v. Levenhagen, with Judge Posner writing, holds that habeas corpus proceedings must be held in abeyance until the state provides substantial new evidence that Mr. Holmes’s psychiatric illness is sufficiently under control to justify the resumption of these proceedings...continue to full postFull post as published by Capital Defense Weekly on April 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.








