Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Qui Tam Blogs -> Whistleblower Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Qui Tam
: Whistleblower Lawyer BlogIRS Tax Whistleblower Progress Continues with IRS Chief Counsel's Advice on Informant Contacts
By Finch McCranie, Esq.
The new IRS Whistleblower Rewards Program continues to take shape, as the IRS's Chief Counsel has advised IRS employees on the contacts they may have with certain whistleblowers or "informants."
The new IRS Whistleblower Program for tax whistleblowers is an exciting development. It has brought together a team of extremely qualified professionals at the IRS, and has provided them the legal means to create an effective whistleblower program.
This Notice (CC-2008-011) addresses what contacts IRS employees may have with (1) informants with information about their current employer; and (2) informants who act as a taxpayer's representative in an IRS examination or other IRS matter.
The IRS's dealings with whistleblower or informants can present sensitive issues of privilege and confidentiality of information, as our whistleblower lawyer blog has discussed previously (and as I have discussed in a panel discussion last Fall with IRS Whistleblower Office Director Stephen Whitlock.)
This Notice from the IRS Chief Counsel's Office recognizes the need to protect "privilege issues that may be present when an informant is a current employee and/or the taxpayer's representative. It should be assumed that a current employee or a taxpayer's representative has access to information that may be privileged and there has been no affirmative waiver by the taxpayer of applicable privileges. The use of potentially privileged information by the Service can also have the same effect of tainting an issue or an entire case."
The IRS Notice reiterates the "one-bite" rule that permits the government to use information from a private party, "even if the private party obtained the information in an illicit or illegal manner as long as the government is a passive recipient of the information and did not encourage or acquiesce in the private party's conduct." This "one-bite" rule is derived from a 1921 Supreme Court decision, Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921).
Full post as published by Whistleblower Lawyer Blog on March 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Fire Chief Whistleblower
City of DuPont agrees to $72,000 resignation and severance settlement.
Police Chief Whistleblower
Argentine Township agrees to pay former employee $650,000 harassment and retaliation settlement.
Qui Tam Whistleblower - Government Fraud - Qui Tam Lawsuit
Qui Tam Whistleblower alleging fraud against the government reported by an individual acting as a government whistleblower.
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.
Police Whistleblower
Officer awarded $980,000 for whistleblower violations and retaliation.
City and Mayor Whistleblower
Two officers awarded part of $8 million whistleblower settlement.

Give that undercover federal drug informant a shiny dollar coin
The IRS Office of Chief Counsel -- A Great Place to Start Your Tax Career
It Ain't Easy Being a SOX Whistleblower
A Whistleblower Wins! A Whistleblower Wins!
New Whistleblower Law to Protect Consumer Product Safety







