Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patently Obvious
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patently ObviousPatently-O Bits and Bytes No. 20
By Dennis Crouch, Esq.
ADVERTISEMENTS
SurveyMonkey: I am conducting an anonymous FOUR MINUTE readership survey. Please help me to figure out who reads Patently-O and how you read Patently-O. In a future survey, I’ll get your help improving the site. [Please Take the Survey]- Bye Bye Markush: The USPTO has published its “Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis” of the proposed changes to Markush Claims. [IRFA][Proposed Rules]. According to the PTO, about 22% of all patent applications contain affected claims, with the highest percentages in Biotech and Chemical cases. The proposed rules would limit Markush alternatives only to those that are not overlapping and that do not make the claim difficult to construe. There is still some time to comment on the changes.
Full post as published by Patently Obvious on March 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 25Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 8Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)
Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 22Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)








