Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> FindLaw's Common Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: FindLaw's Common LawWhistleblower Suits Against Companies Falsely Claiming Patents Rise
Since a Federal District Court ruling last December, a certain type of whistleblower suit has surged with more than 130 filed in the last four months. The court's decision has allowed the fines for companies found guilty of "false marking" patent claims on product labels to increase from the previously set $500 per offence, to thousands or millions, depending on the number of units sold.
The National Law Journal reports false marking is the practice of labeling a product with a patent number that is expired, or does not apply to the product label it is on. This practice, according to attorneys for plaintiffs, is misleading to the public. The Public Patent Foundation at Cardozo School of Law has five pending suits based on the whistleblower statute, including one against the company that produces the product Cold-EEZE cold-remedy lozenges. According to the Foundation, the packaging shows expired patent numbers listed on the products. The foundation filed the cases because "there's a whole basket of public harms that are caused by this lying by companies," said executive director Daniel Ravicher.
The whistleblower suits are unusual because they allow those bring the suit to retain one half of any damages awarded by the court against the defendants. Those defending companies say the so-called whistleblowers are merely bounty-hunters, out to make a buck at a company's expense.
However you may view the increase in these suits, as actions on behalf of consumers, or nuisance suits against honest businesses, the boom may soon be curtailed. According to The Journal, two upcoming cases in the federal courts could seriously affect the number of cases filed. One case may result in the removal of the right to sue from whistleblowers, and limit it to those actually damaged by the false marking, such as direct competitors. A second may change the way a court determines a company's intent to deceive consumers.
Currently, the Senate is considering legislation that would include limiting false marking suits to competitors as well.
In the meantime, good advice to companies from Wisconsin attorney Justin Gray: a quick Google patent database, or U.S. Patent Office search, will tell you if your patent is current or not. Good advice to consumers, judge a product on its merits not on company claims, even those right on the label.
Related Resources:
- Federal Circuit Ruling Sparks Surge of Patent Whistleblower Suits (The National Law Journal on Law.com)
- Lucid Patent, LLC to Host False Marking Webinar (PR Newswire, FindLaw News)
- Patent Basics (FindLaw)
Full post as published by FindLaw's Common Law on April 07, 2010 (boomark / email).
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Two Energy Companies Settle Whistleblower Qui Tam Suit
Bunk Beds
Injuries on the rise
Qui Tam Whistleblower - Government Fraud - Qui Tam Lawsuit
Qui Tam Whistleblower alleging fraud against the government reported by an individual acting as a government whistleblower.
Police Whistleblower
Officer awarded $980,000 for whistleblower violations and retaliation.
City and Mayor Whistleblower
Two officers awarded part of $8 million whistleblower settlement.
Brinker International
allegedly falsely advertising the nutritional information on their so-called low calorie menu selections.

Washington Post article says government can't keep up with whistleblower suits
More Failures to Keep a Low Profile When Falsely Claiming Disability
U.S. and States Join Whistleblower Suits Against Wyeth Over Medicaid Payments
Can 'Food Addiction' Be Fodder for Lawsuits







