ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

Board member acting on the advice of counsel cannot be deemed to have engaged in willful misconduct

ADVERTISEMENTS
Board member acting on the advice of counsel cannot be deemed to have engaged in willful misconduct
Application of Carol Gillen for the removal of Nicholas Mauro as a member of the Board of Education of the City School District of The City of Middletown, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 16,030

Carol Gillen asked the Commissioner of Education to remove Nicholas Mauro, a member of the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Middletown from the Board. Without considering the events underlying Ms. Gillen?s application, the decision is instructive as it sets out the criteria considered by the Commissioner in addressing such a petition.

The decision explains:

The Education Law §306 authorizes the Commissioner of Education to remove a member of a board of education for a willful violation or neglect of duty under the Education Law for a willful disobedience of any decision, rule or regulation of the Board of Regents or the Commissioner of Education.

To be considered willful, the board member?s actions must have been intentional with a wrongful purpose.

A board member who acts on the advice of counsel has not engaged in a willful violation or neglect of duty justifying removal under Education Law §306.

In an appeal to the Commissioner, a petitioner has the burden of demonstrating a clear legal right to the relief requested and has the burden of establishing the facts upon which the applicant seeks relief.

Addressing the merits of Gellen?s petition, the Commissioner decided that she had not met her burden of demonstrating that Board member Mauro had engaged in any willful or intentional misconduct warranting his removal from office in view of the fact that the record indicated that Mauro had acted on the advice of counsel regarding the matter.

For those interested in reading the full text of the Commissioner?s determination, it is posted on the Internet at http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume49/d16030.htm.

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on April 05, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0123 secs (new cache)