Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Senators raise doubt over testimony of Nashville judicial nominee; CCA counsel quizzed in judicial confirmation"
ADVERTISEMENTS
"Senators raise doubt over testimony of Nashville judicial nominee; CCA counsel quizzed in judicial confirmation": Friday's edition of The Tennessean contained an article that begins, "The accuracy of testimony by Gustavus 'Gus'' Puryear IV at his confirmation hearing to be a federal judge is being questioned by four Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Puryear is general counsel of Nashville-based private prison giant Corrections Corporation of America and was nominated by Republican President Bush. After the February hearing, he provided written answers to additional questions about the company's handling of the death of an inmate at a company-run facility in Nashville, potential conflicts of interest he would face as a judge and his membership in the Belle Meade Country Club. The sometimes-pointed questions and Puryear's responses again raise the stakes in his confirmation. Once thought to be routine, Puryear's nomination is being fought by a coalition of civil rights, labor and other groups spearheaded by the Private Corrections Institute, which opposes prison privatization. Puryear's responses were released Thursday."
The article also provides links to PDF files consisting of the nominee's responses to the written questions from various Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Full post as published by How Appealing on March 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

GOP senators question quick action on judicial nominee
Vacancies in the Federal Judiciary
Kiggins on Judicial Confirmations
Analysis: Supreme Court Nominee Statements Provide Little Insight on Future Behavior
Bush Judicial Nominee and Law Professor Accused of Plagarism
A Really Stupid Ad on Judicial Appointments:








