Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Sentencing Law and Policy
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Sentencing Law and PolicyA busy week that was at SCOTUS for sentencing fans
By Douglas A. Berman
ADVERTISEMENTS
The biggest story for criminal justice fans coming from the Supreme Court this week was surely its ruling in Padilla concerning the application of the Sixth Amendment to how an attorney advises a defendant prior to a plea (details here and here). But the Justices also heard argument on consequential sentencing issues in Dillon and Barber and on some other complicated criminal justice issues with various sentencing implications (see list here).
Anyone looking for comprehensive coverage of all these happenings should head over to SCOTUSblog, but here I can link my recent coverage of the Justices' doings during the dynamic week that was. Many of these posts have long, thoughtful comments by readers that especially merit careful reading:
Padilla prevails in his ineffectiveness claim concerning plea advice
Is the Padilla ruling as profound as it seems?
Sentencing day at the US Supreme Court
"Justice Kennedy prods Obama to commute sentences"
Telling(?) distractions during Dillon SCOTUS oral argument
"Supreme Court justices have a good time debating 'good time'"
I will have more to say specifically about the Padilla ruling in a subsequent post, though readers are welcome to continue the commentary on this major Sixth Amendment decision...continue to full postFull post as published by Sentencing Law and Policy on April 04, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Closing the First Week of the SCOTUS Term
SCOTUS Petitions to Watch: Jury consultation of Bible during sentencing
Sentencing Guidelines, Discrimination, and Variance Explained
12 Texecutions Set for Over Next Six Weeks








