Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Day on Torts
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Day on TortsProducts Liability Judgment Against Ford Reversed
By John Day
The South Carolina Supreme Court has reversed a judgment for the plaintiffs in a case against Ford Motor Company. The plaintiffs claimed that the Ford Explorer in which they were riding had a defective cruise control and defective seat belts.
The court ruled that the trial judge should have excluded Bill Williams as an expert on cruise control diagnosis. The court also ruled that Dr. Anoty Anderson was not qualified to reliabily testify as to alternative designs and his theory concerning the cause of teh sudden acceleration.
Finally, the court ruled that certain claimed "other similar incidents" were not substantially similar.
The case is Watson v. For Motor Company, No. 26786 (S.C. March 15, 2010).
Full post as published by Day on Torts on March 28, 2010 (boomark / email).
Ford Explorers
Ford Motor Co. agrees to give out $500 vouchers to SUV owners in class action settlement.
Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Vehicles
Ford Recalls 4.5 Million Vehicles
Ford Recalls 575,000 Windstar Minivans
Ford Recalls 575,000 Windstar Minivans
Ford Settles SUV Rollover Lawsuit for $21M
Ford Settles SUV Rollover Lawsuit for $21M
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...
NHTSA Investigates Rusty Fuel Tank Straps in Ford F-150 Pickups
Rusty Fuel Tank Straps in Ford F-150 Pickups NHTSA Investigates

California Appellate Court Refuses to Change Its Ruling Against Ford
Geistfeld on L&E and Products Liability
PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN CALIFORNIA; WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW.
Component Manufacturer's Defense Not Established for Summary Judgment
California Auto Defects Lawyers File Product Liability Case Against Ford









