ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Media & Entertainment Law Blogs -> Sports Biz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Media & Entertainment Law

: Sports Biz

More Details and a Clearer Winner Emerge on MLS Labor Accord

ADVERTISEMENTS
The new MLS Collective Bargaining Agreement salvaged the on time opening of the season, and the debut of the new Philadelphia Union at year old, and league success, Seattle Sounders.  Unfortunately for MLS, the debut will take place Thursday night opposite perhaps the most attractive Sweet Sixteen Regional matchup between Cornell and Kentucky.  Nevertheless, without the last minute deal, the players had committed to a walkout that would have delayed the opening of the season for an unknown length of time.

So, as details of the new CBA emerge, it's fair to judge who won and who lost in this standoff.  The winners are actually fairly clear:  ESPN and the league's other broadcast partners, Adidas and the other sponsors and most importantly the owners; the losers, the players.

Certainly the players came away with much of what they were seeking: a raise in the salary cap from $2.3 million to $2.5 million, a raise in the minimum from $34,000 to $40,000, and a re-entry draft for players out of contract.  But, most significantly, the players did not achieve any form of free agency, which going in had been their single most important demand.

Realistically, the players were probably never going to achieve free agency, at least not in this go-around.  The owners position was simply too strong, financially and legally.  A player's rights never left the league even if his contract expired with a particular club.  So, the players set out to gain some measure of freedom of movement.  Unfortunately for them they were simply not in the economic position to battle it out with the owners.  They had not built a large enough strike fund to support the players through what would have been a very lengthy work stoppage, not to mention the difficulty and potential damage to their future a work stoppage would have wrought in a year when soccer interest in the US should be at near an all-time high due to the upcoming World Cup.  At the end of the day, the  players had little choice but to take the owners last offer and start the season on time.
 

Full post as published by Sports Biz on March 25, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0159 secs (new cache)