Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Taxation & Estate Planning Blogs -> Rubin on Tax
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Taxation & Estate Planning
: Rubin on TaxROYALTIES DID NOT HAVE TO BE CAPITALIZED
By Charles Rubin
On January 21, 2009, we discussed how a manufacturer of kitchen items was required by the Tax Court to capitalize royalties paid to put Pyrex and Oneida trademarks on their kitchen tools. The Tax Court found that the trademarks were part of the production process, and thus could not be immediately expensed.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has now reversed the Tax Court, and allowed the taxpayer to immediately deduct the royalty payments. The Court held that the royalty payments were not ?properly allocable to the property produced? so as to require capitalization under the Code Section 263A uniform capitalization rules.
The Court focused on the royalty payments being calculated on items SOLD and not PRODUCED, and thus were more in the character of expenses for marketing instead of production. Presumably, if the royalty payments were instead based on units produced, capitalization would have been required.
Robinson Knife Manufacturing Co., Inc., 105 AFTR 2d ¶2010-634 (CA-2 3/19/2010)
Full post as published by Rubin on Tax on March 23, 2010 (boomark / email).
NiSource
Settles Natural Gas Royalties Case for $380 Million
Tulsa County Natural Gas Royalties
Plaintiffs Awarded $126 Million

Breakdown of the Fed's $13.9 Trillion Commitment
Service Allocates Merger Costs Between Curently Deductible v. Capitalized Costs
Law of the Game on Joystiq: Royalties 101
Deal or Die for Under-Capitalized BankUnited
Singer Avoids Being Held in Contempt Over Alleged Non-Compliance with Courts Orders on Discovery








