Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics Forumaround the web (March 22, 2010)
ADVERTISEMENTS
Jim Mille explains why his PR course will emphasize scholarship on cognitive dissonance. . . . . . Main Justice has a long, detailed article about whether the Office of the Inspector General will, or should, take over the OPR's role in investigating the ethics of DOJ lawyers. . . . . . Encyclopaedia Britannic has sued Dickstein Shapiro for $250 million over allegedly botched patent prosecution. . . . . . A Connecticut lawyer is accused of trading legal services for sexual relations. . . . . . If you're interested in the interplay between insurers and insured about how to notify the carrier and and to self-represent in liability cases, here's an article about a county counsel who allegedly informed the carrier just days before discovery closed of a tort action that was thought to be well within the $300,000 retention amount -- and that resulted in a $30 million jury verdict (since reduced to $19 million). The county's trial lawyer is not liable to the carriers, according to a United States District Court judge.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on March 22, 2010 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

TX3: Sniff of backpack directed to be left in classroom was valid
MO: Burlgar alarm and open door exigent circumstances
KY: DNA testing of juvenile offenders constitutional
LA2: Defendant was called in for a DNA test and he consented









