Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Benefits & ERISA Law Blogs -> Pension Protection Act Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Benefits & ERISA Law
: Pension Protection Act BlogThree Out of Four: The New Proposed Regs on Funding Requirements for DB Plans
By Suzanne Wynn
One of my favorite actuaries called me today about the meaning of this paragraph in the new Proposed Regulations on the Measurement of Assets and Liabilities for Pension Funding Purposes, released by the IRS on December 28, 2007. The paragraph is:
I. Overview. These proposed regulations are the third in a series of proposed regulations under new section 430. (footnote reference). These proposed regulations would provide guidance on the determination of assets and liabilities for purposes of applying the new funding rules of section 430. The Treasury Department and the IRS intend to issue additional proposed regulations relating to other portions of the rules under section 430 (including sections 430(a), (c), and (j)) in the first part of 2008. It is expected that those regulations will be effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009.
Footnote: Proposed regulation sections 1.430(h)(3)-1 and 1.430(h)(3)-2, relating to the mortality tables used to determine liabilities under section 430(h)(3), were issued May 29, 2007 (REG-143601-06, 72 FR 29456), and proposed regulation section 1.430(f)-1, relating to prefunding and funding standard carryover balances under section 430(f), was issued August 31, 2007 (REG-113891-07, 72 FR 50544).
Note: Announcement 2007-71 corrected the proposed regulation issued May 29, 2007. The proposed regulations issued on August 31, 2007, were corrected by this Correction.
So what does third in a series mean? The IRS handily provided the footnote naming the first two pieces of guidance about Code section 430. This is the third piece of guidance with more guidance on the way. My hope is that once the additional guidance is issued by the IRS in early 2008, I will be able to put together a cohesive explanation of Code section 430 and its impact on defined benefit plans. Of course, any cohesive Code section 430 explanation will require a little help from my friends.
Technorati Tags: Pension Protection Act, ppa, lump sum, defined benefit, code section 430, 1.430(h)(3), ERISA
Full post as published by Pension Protection Act Blog on January 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Consumer Funding
BlueHippo Funding agrees to set up $5 million restitution fund after modifying its computer sales program.
T-mobile data plans, T-mobile, t-mobile phones
T-Mobile Faces Class Action over Limited Unlimited Data Plans
Retirement Plans
Teacher group to pay $375,000 settlement in investments lawsuit.
Settlement Proposed in Class Action Against Facebook
Facebook will Close Beacon in Proposed Settlement
Brown Greer et al.
alleging that the six law firms handling the Vioxx settlement failed to provide money for reimbursements to lien rights of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) health plans.
Expedia Class Action Settlement Proposed for $123.4 Million
Expedia Settlement Proposed for $123.4 Million

Proposed Fed Regs on Retirement Plans
Those Proposed Fee Disclosure Regs.
ABA Tax Section Submits Comments on Proposed Regs on Tax Strategy Patents
Jacobson: Casualty Repairs Under the Proposed Capitalization Regs
IRS Releases Proposed Tax Return Preparer Penalties Under §§ 6694 & 6695
New Proposed Regulations for 529 Plans









