ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The Gavel

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The Gavel

JAS Partner Seeks Full Campaign Disclosure in MI

By Peter Hardin

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Michigan Campaign Finance Network, a watchdog group, is urging Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land to help bring “real transparency and accountability to state election campaigns” through a declaration of rigorous financial-disclosure rules following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.

MCFN is a partner group of the Justice at Stake Campaign. In a filing with Michigan’s Department of State, MCFN blasted “Michigan?s weak campaign finance regulations [that] have allowed more than $45 million worth of television campaign advertisements to go unreported” since 2000.

That staggering sum includes $14.3 million in independent expenditures during state Supreme Court campaigns from 2000 to 2008, according to MCFN. The group said extensive political expenditures for “issue” advertisements were allowed to go unreported because the ads stopped short of explicitly advocating a candidate’s election or defeat. MCFN warned that during the decade, voters were left in the dark:

“The voters of Michigan were deprived on any knowledge of who paid for some of the most widely noted state campaign advertisements of the decade.”

Citizens United lifted restrictions on corporate political spending for independent advertising to support or oppose candidates in elections, and in response, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce has asked Land for a declaratory ruling clarifying state law.

By an 8-1 vote in Citizens United, the court also ruled that all groups that spend to influence elections can be forced to disclose their financial sources.  MCFN highlighted that and other features of Citizens United in contending that Land must issue a declaratory ruling broad enough “to require reporting of all candidate-focused electioneering communications, and disclosure of the ultimate sources of financing for those communications.”

Without robust disclosure rules, the group cautioned, corporate supporters of candidates will be able to set up a “system of Russian dolls–shells within shells–to avoid disclosure of their activity.”

To learn more about the Michigan Chamber’s request for a declaratory ruling, click on Gavel Grab. You can learn more about Citizens United from Gavel Grab or Justice at Stake’s press release about the decision, or from the JAS amicus brief.

Full post as published by The Gavel on March 17, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0129 secs (new cache)