ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Healthcare Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Health Law

: Healthcare Law Blog

Is the ?Slaughter Solution? for Health Care Reform Constitutional?

By Greg Piche'

ADVERTISEMENTS

I

Let the games begin!  The Democrats are going to use the ?self execution? rule, also known as the ?Slaughter solution? by the Right and the ?Gingrich? rule by the left, depending on whose ox is being gored, to pass and deliver a health care reform bill to the President. This is a ?cram down? use of House rules to defeat the ?cram down? defeat of majority rule in the Senate by filibuster.  Is it Constitutional?  Some, including a conservative former 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge, Michael McConnell say no, citing a violation of the ?presentation clause? and the case of Clinton v. State of New York, 524 U. S. 417 (1998) (line item veto permits the President to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of acts of Congress and all such acts must be first approved by both houses and Congress and the presented to the President for signature to create new law).

 So here is the deal. The Dems plan to incorporate the Senate Bill already passed with 60 votes into a new bill that will ?deem? the Senate bill approved by the house and will offer what is essentially a new bill amending the statute thus adopted.  The Senate bill will have to be presented to the President to sign which will make it law and then the Senate will have to agree to the House amending bill  only requiring a majority to amend) which will then go to the President to make the final law.

Assuming that the proper ?presentation? to the President of the initial bill is made it is difficult to see how the maneuver is unconstitutional.  You live by the rules and you die by the rules.  The issue here is very different than giving the President the authority to unilaterally amend Acts of Congress passed and presented to him and signed into law. There is no constitutional requirement that the House vote on the Senate bill be totally separate from the vote to also subsequently amend it.

Full post as published by Healthcare Law Blog on March 16, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0173 secs (new cache)