Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Health Law Blogs -> Healthcare Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Health Law
: Healthcare Law BlogIs the ?Slaughter Solution? for Health Care Reform Constitutional?
By Greg Piche'
I
Let the games begin! The Democrats are going to use the ?self execution? rule, also known as the ?Slaughter solution? by the Right and the ?Gingrich? rule by the left, depending on whose ox is being gored, to pass and deliver a health care reform bill to the President. This is a ?cram down? use of House rules to defeat the ?cram down? defeat of majority rule in the Senate by filibuster. Is it Constitutional? Some, including a conservative former 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge, Michael McConnell say no, citing a violation of the ?presentation clause? and the case of Clinton v. State of New York, 524 U. S. 417 (1998) (line item veto permits the President to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of acts of Congress and all such acts must be first approved by both houses and Congress and the presented to the President for signature to create new law).
So here is the deal. The Dems plan to incorporate the Senate Bill already passed with 60 votes into a new bill that will ?deem? the Senate bill approved by the house and will offer what is essentially a new bill amending the statute thus adopted. The Senate bill will have to be presented to the President to sign which will make it law and then the Senate will have to agree to the House amending bill only requiring a majority to amend) which will then go to the President to make the final law.
Assuming that the proper ?presentation? to the President of the initial bill is made it is difficult to see how the maneuver is unconstitutional. You live by the rules and you die by the rules. The issue here is very different than giving the President the authority to unilaterally amend Acts of Congress passed and presented to him and signed into law. There is no constitutional requirement that the House vote on the Senate bill be totally separate from the vote to also subsequently amend it.
Full post as published by Healthcare Law Blog on March 16, 2010 (boomark / email).
Medicare
Guide to government health insurance for the elderly
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Linked to Eye Infection Fusarium Keratiti
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Bausch Lomb Renu Moistureloc Recall
Contact Lens Solution Product Recall
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
FFDA Issues Warning about Stolen Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution and Ipratropium Bromide Inhalation Solution
Albuterol, Ipratropium FDA Warns Consumers not to Use
Lawsuit Filed Against Legacy Health Care Facilities for Nursing Home Abuse
Legacy Health Care Facilities Face Class Action Over Allegations of Abuse
Coventry Health Care, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Coventry Health Care, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Skilled Health Care Faces $670 Million in Damages over Nursing Home Violations
Sun Mar Health Care Settles Class Action for $2 Million
Pittsburgh Health Care Facilities
Facing Wages Class Actions

Balkin on the Slaughter Solution
Michael W. McConnell: The House Health-Care Vote and the Constitution
It May Be Clever, but It Is Not Constitutional
A Health Care Reform Alternative
THE SLAUGHTER SOLUTION: It may be clever, but it is not constitutional.
"Abortion Neutral" Health Care Reform








