Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Groklaw

Intellectual Property Law

: Groklaw

Judge Denies 2 Novell Motions: for Mistrial and to Allow Evidence

By Pamela Jones et al.

It seems Novell moved for mistrial on March 15 at the trial in SCO v. Novell. And there has been a decision on Novell's motion to allow evidence. The docket doesn't yet reflect the order on the motion to allow evidence, but you can see that it happened in this, the full text of the order on the oral motion by Novell for a mistrial:

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Mistrial, made orally on March 15, 2010. For the same reasons stated in denying Defendant's Motion to Allow Evidence Responding to SCO's Allegation that Novell's Slander Continues "To This Very Day," Defendant's Motion for Mistrial is DENIED.

As soon as we have the order providing "the same reasons, I'll update this article.

Full post as published by Groklaw on March 15, 2010 (boomark / email).