ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Prawfs

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Commentary

: Prawfs

If this is not clearly established law . . .

By Dan Markel, Ethan Leib, Rick Garnett, Matt Bodie, Paul Horwitz , Steve Vladeck, and Orly Lobel

ADVERTISEMENTS

In late January, a 13-year-old female student at Roberto Clemente Middle School in Germantown, Maryland, refused to stand or speak during the Pledge of Allegiance. Her teacher demanded she stand and, when the girl refused, he kicked her out of the room and sent her to a counselor's office. When she refused to stand the following day, the teacher called a school security officer to escort the girl to the counselor's office. When the girl's mother contacted an assistant principal, the assistant principal said the girl should apologize for her "defiance." Needless to say, the ACLU was then called. (H/T: John Q. Barrett and The Jackson List).

Well, the school district (or its lawyer) finally did a bit of constitutional research to discover that students cannot be compelled to participate or recite the Pledge. Actually, such research was unnecessary, since the district's own policies (consistent with state law) provide that "You will have the opportunity to participate in and/or watch patriotic exercises in school. You cannot be required to say a pledge, sing an anthem, or take part in patriotic exercises. No one will be permitted to intentionally embarrass you if you choose not to participate."

Apparently they forgot to tell this teacher--the student clearly was embarrassed and the teacher clearly embarrassed her.

The school board apologized to the student, announced its regret to the entire community ("this shoud not have occurred"), and promised to hold educational sessions for the students and this teacher.

Query whether the family sues. No way could the teacher win on qualified immunity--little is more clearly established than Barnette and there are no factual distinctions in play that a reasonable teacher would not have known he could not compel a student to participate in the Pledge. The student seems, from some news accounts, to have suffered tangible harm, so she might even get more than nominal damages--punitive damages might even be in play, given the intentionality and obviousness of the violation. More generally, school boards (and thus courts) have struggled, particularly since 9/11, to reimpose or re-emphasize symbolic patriotism in the schools while also respecting First Amendment liberties and Barnette's command. This is an example in which government "fell short."

Full post as published by Prawfs on March 12, 2010 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0192 secs (new cache)