Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> New York Attorney Malpractice Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Malpractice
: New York Attorney Malpractice BlogA Fairly Rare Case On Appeal in Legal Malpractice
By (Andrew Lavoott Bluestone)
It's fairly rare for defendant-attorney to move for summary judgment in a legal malpractice case, lose, and then lose at appeal. Why do defendants move for summary judgment ? Beyond the obvious answer that it is a shot that they can take without any downside, the general reason is that defendant believes that it can win in one of two areas.
The first area is generally some lack of privity, or some lack of authority in the representation. For example, that plaintiff did not cooperate in giving an affidavit, or plaintiff did not pay expenses for an expert, or lacked standing because of bankruptcy,
The second area is plaintiff's generalized inability to prove success on the underlying case. As examples, that there was no collectible assets, or the statute had already passed when the client came to the attorney, or the such.
While we cannot tell why defendant took his appeal in Mueller v Fruchter ;2010 NY Slip Op 01771 ;Appellate Division, Second Department ; Decided on March 2, 2010 we do see that neither Supreme Court nor the Appellate Division thought much of the motion:
"Here, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's first cause of action (see Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453, 454; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d 789, 790). The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since they failed to show that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of her legal malpractice cause of action (see Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d at 454; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d at 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d at 790). Thus, we need not address the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).
Full post as published by New York Attorney Malpractice Blog on March 08, 2010 (boomark / email).
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Gallbladder Surgery Errors Damage Bile Duct
X-ray Procedures Can Reduce Gall Bladder Surgery Error Rates
Legal Forms
Business and Commercial Legal Forms
Best Law Movies
Greatest Legal Movies selected by ABA Journal
Law & Order Depicts Police Procedures and Criminal Justice
Accuracy of Criminal Justice Depiction on Television
Legal Malpractice
legal malpractice lawsuits.
Jury Awards $1.8 Million in Legal Malpractice Suit
Jury Awards $1.8 Million in Legal Malpractice Suit
Accounting Malpractice - Accountant Malpractice, Accounting Malpractice Lawsuit
Accounting Malpractice alleging financial malpractice by accountants.
Jewelry Television
alleging treated gemstones were advertised as "extremely rare" and "all natural".
Philip Morris
Loses Appeal, Will Pay Millions
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict
Asbestos Mesothelioma Victim Wins Appeal of $20 Million Asbestos Cancer Verdict

Former Client's Intentional Wrongdoing Bars Malpractice Action
Court of Appeals Finds Mention of Liability Insurance Permissible in Malpractice Case
Magna Bank Finishes Presenting Evidence in Legal Malpractice Lawsuit
Indiana Legal Malpractice Case Addresses The Issue of Equitable Subrogation








